CRC Logo - Click to Go to CRC for Catchment Hydrology Home Page
Home - Click to Return to Bushfires Main Page   Introduction - Click for a Introduction to the Site   News - Click here for the latest news   Background - Click here for Background Information about Fires and Hydrology   Frequently Asked Questions - Click here for a list of Frequently Asked Questions   Bibliography - Click here for a listing of relevant papers, etc   Downloads - Click here for a list of documents you can download from this site   Contacts - Click here for a list of relevant contacts from teh Advisory Board that put together this site   Links - Click here for a list of relevant links   Gallery - Click here a gallery  
bib_small

CRC for Catchment Hydrology Bushfire Gallery

The CRC for Catchment Hydrology wishes to thank the various contributors to our gallery:

Previous Home Next

Photo_6

The Mitta catchment upstream of Dartmouth was the worst affected in terms of
both areal extent and severity of the burn. River Murray Water estimate that 95% of the
Dartmouth catchment has been fire affected. It was difficult to locate any
green canopy in the Dartmouth catchment. The only unburnt areas observed
were the open grasslands around Benambra.

This photo shows Big River (which becomes the Mitta) upstream of Anglers
Rest. These areas are representative of the majority of the catchment
observed. The canopy and undergrowth has been completely burned across most
of the Dartmouth catchment, and the ash
layer seems to be much thicker. There is a higher proportion of smooth bark
trees in the Dartmouth catchment (due to higher altitudes?) than other
catchments observed. The smoothbark trees generally do not exhibit the
epicormic growth that the thicker bark trees do - at least not yet.